IRATENINJA.COM

An Irate-Nation.com Project

U.S. GOVERNMENT BANS FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND RELIGON!!!! H.R. 1388 PASSED!!!

Ω

THE U.S. GOVERNMENT HAS PASSED H.R. 1388 OR ‘GIVE’ ACT. DEMANDING CITIZENS 18-25 SERVE IN YOUTH CORPS. OR DOMESTIC ARMY SEPARATE FROM OUR MILITARY, BANNING RELIGION, AND ENDING FREEDOM OF SPEECH.

This bill has become law. It was signed by Barack Obama. [Last Updated: Jun 27, 2010 http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h111-1388

Filed under: 411, Activism, american politics, anti-american, Communism, Congress, elections, Free Speech, indoctrination, Liberal, Liberty, Marxism, Politics, Prayer, Presidency, Religion, Truth, Video, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

It Seems Like The Toughest Thing To Do Is Support The President

The main thing I wanna do nowadays is say something that could help ease the pressure off the Executive. Things seem to be going better in Iraq; the economy is excellent; I’m still thrilled about things like the Mexico City policy and the campaigning he did in the election prior to this last one that brought Republicans into office.

Perhaps the main obstacle to recognizing that the President has done anything right isn’t on the Left or the Right. Conspiracy theory can’t go anywhere, after all, if people don’t believe it. And criticisms of the President don’t have to add up to a complete repudiation of the President’s policies.

Maybe the main obstacle is the composition of Congress. Listening to Senator Biden the other day made me want to throw up. I asserted shortly afterward that he sounded like the sort of blowhard that brags way too much in bars and gets every woman to turn far, far away from him.

Now I’m thinking that he, like the rest of Congress, didn’t just get the idea of “let’s throw lots of facts that may or may not add up at people to show how smart and concerned we are, instead of admitting we’re a bunch of wusses” from nowhere. This particular style of “argument” – bullying people with information that may or may not be true – isn’t just characteristic of idiots at bars.

It’s also the hallmark of dealing with overconfident all-knowing arrogant old people, which Congress represents all too well.

I should make it clear I love the elderly, and find them very engaging and thoughtful for the most part. And I owe people older than me quite a lot, and I’ve seen a number of them age well and I’d be happy if I aged half that well.

It is because of old people I know something. It’s because I owe so much to one segment that I have to rail against this other segment.

I think all of us know exactly what segment of the elderly I’m talking about right now.

This is the segment which only knows how to “geeze” – as Dave Barry said, regarding “how to geeze,” these are people that pick one speed for their car, and keep that speed whether in the driveway or on the interstate.

Instead of term limits, can we get an age restriction on people in Congress? I mean, this is ridiculous – at least the jerk at the bar can be made to shut up if someone bigger than him stares hard at him. But Granny and Grandpa are immune to the threat of confrontation, because they’ve got nothing to lose, and heck, I don’t want to get strangled by a hearing aid cord.

The key difference between Congress, the old people that like to hear themselves talk & bullies, and the older people that mean genuinely well, is that one set of people want to be right just for the sake of being right.

The other group wants to give to others, and wants a legacy of charity.

In a sense, these two groups of older people are symbolic for the value of knowledge: either we want to say we’re right for an ego boost or power only, or we want to be right because there’s far more on the line.

Perhaps the key is that instead of an age restriction, we should go find those who are older that are living their lives well – not just being active or being loud about politics, but instead giving back to their families, doing the best for others who are worse off – and let’s have them run. Let’s get people in politics who want nothing to do with politics, because they know how life is meant to be lived, and understand how difficult it is to do anything well.

Powered by ScribeFire.

Filed under: Congress, Double Standards, Presidency

Democrats spooked by rise of ‘new Reagan’

Telegraph.co.uk The Democratic party is so alarmed by the prospect of competing against Fred Thompson, a Republican who portrays himself as a successor to Ronald Reagan, that it is advising campaigners how to attack the former actor and Tennessee senator.

Mr Thompson is not expected to announce his candidacy for the Republican nomination until next month, but Democratic strategists fear the combination of his conservatism, southern charm and populist style could make him a hard man to beat in 2008. Some polls have already placed him in the top two Republicans, underlining the weakness of his rivals. ::::More::::

Filed under: american politics, conservative, Democrats, elections, Fred Thompson, Presidency, Reagan, Republicans

Passing the Torch: Who’s the Next Gipper?

The first 2008 presidential primary is still about seven months away. But there’s a fierce race on in Republican circles to see who can lay claim to being the next great conservative leader. That’s where Ronald Reagan enters the picture…

In every presidential contest people always seem to ask the same questions: Who can get the most votes? Who can raise the most cash? Who can kiss the most babies? But for the 2008 Republican race, the burning question is – who can invoke Reagan’s name the most?

Read more here: cbn.com

Filed under: american politics, conservative, elections, Presidency, Reagan, Republicans, Uncategorized

I Should Say That I Don’t Like One Bit How Gingrich Is Criticizing the President

As far as I’m concerned, anti-Bush porn

The fundamental disagreement between Speaker Gingrich and I is that he is far too practical and can’t see the flood that is American politics. He’s probably thinking there is a “center,” or those who are more liberal that he can get into the fold in order to run a campaign.

I have written before about the debasement of speech in our current climate, and how looking for “smart solutions” (i.e. his proposal for educational policy, his ideas about consolidating economic gain) his  to problems might be good politics in terms of getting elected, but terrible politics if America is to be a force for good.

If Newt Gingrich wants to win me over – me, who considers him the most qualified candidate for the job – he has to start taking on the climate of conspiracy theory which makes whatever President Bush do seem wrong.

If he does not start slamming that climate, the climate which looked for all sorts of dirt on this Administration, could barely make any of it stick, and in the process obstructed its ability to govern and conduct a war, he will probably demonstrate that he does not have what it takes to govern.

The problem with that climate is that it demands perfection. No elected official is allowed to do things like “conduct a foreign policy,” because people might die or things might go wrong. The idea behind corn-fuel is that rid of “foreign oil,” we can sit isolationist and not worry about the rest of the world. The criticism of the President on any number of fronts, actually, reduces to anarchism (where people believe all is perfect if “left alone”) or “he isn’t bold enough.”

No one seems to take into account how tough the job of being President is. He doesn’t have choices half the time. Most things the Executive does are mandated. To be shouted down by the people and Congress and the judiciary is the end of the Presidency. He needs some support, after all.

I mean, you know full well that Rightist criticism of the President is getting far more strident and far more irrational. I don’t like his budget or immigration policy. But that doesn’t mean that he picked these things because he’s a liberal – he probably goes that course because of what is feasible. Similarly, he can’t solve all the problems of the war just by being bolder. He’s actually extremely bold right now.

The criticism advanced against him by the Right is that he’s not bold on conservative issues. And I’m just like, at some point, a leader has to be trusted. I don’t know what I would do to get 12 million illegals out of this country. I know this, strengthening the INS would inevitably result in lots of good people who aren’t illegal getting kicked out. And deportation proceedings aren’t exactly cozy nice times – the publicity he’d get would destroy the Administration once and for all, if he built the INS to the level he needed to in order to deny any sort of amnesty wholly. Furthermore, the idea behind a big budget actually makes tactical sense: the idea once upon a time was to cut out the Democrats’ base from under them. One way to do this is staff government with conservatives. Cutting taxes while spending means, of course, that government can’t grow forever: the rate of governmental spending would have to decrease, and what would be left are budget cutting Republicans in government more amenable to dismantling it. Again, I don’t agree with any of this stuff, but isn’t it amazing how quick everyone is to judge before trying to think about why people do things?

If rationales like these haven’t been trotted out before, it’s because of how we conduct politics. We shout at each other. Newt knows this. He knows it has to change.

And it has to change now. I have my disagreements with the President, but demanding perfection from him is not politics. And Newt’s criticisms add up to “he needed to have the trust of the people and be above the conspiracy theory,” and that’s just impossible in today’s day and age. Those of us on the Right couldn’t stop Michael Moore from making a film that was basically slander and driving voters Leftward for literally lying. Until we can moderate the conversation, we can’t hold the administration responsible, for the most part, about what is said about it. It is nearly impossible to be President in this day and age.

Powered by ScribeFire.

Filed under: conservative, Double Standards, newt gingrich, Presidency

I’m With Fred

imwithfred.jpg

Fredinternalv1_guide_07.jpg

Senator Thompson has announced the web address for the newly formed Friends of Fred committee which allows him to raise money and recruit volunteers for a presidential run. You can now donate to Fred’s efforts directly! IMWITHFRED.COM

Filed under: 411, Booya!!!, conservative, elections, Fred Thompson, News, Presidency

The Only Way To Truly Protect Citizens Is Through The Threat and Use of Force

Iran imprisons a 67 year old woman who was visiting her mother. The woman in question was a great advocate of creating dialogue with Iran and not resorting to “stereotyping” the people in charge of their regime as scumbags who should be shot promptly at the first available opportunity.

Let’s be clear, shall we? An injury done to one American is an injury done to all of us. Since injuries will happen, oftentimes by bullies and thugs out there beyond our borders, we need to be ready to fight.

Saying “if they invade, I’ll fight,” which many liberals do say in places that are excellent for political conversation like bars (they’re always bugging me when I’m trying to get digits, that’s another thing that pisses me off), is already a concession that one doesn’t care about the welfare of one other American citizen, or one other human being.

Just war theory came about when Augustine realized that there was something really problematic about always turning the other cheek. What about people that weren’t quite able to turn the other cheek because they were too busy being murdered?

The trouble with pacifism is that it demands the ultimate sacrifice from people that might not share that ideal, or worse yet, haven’t been given a chance to truly achieve the peace of mind and heart such moral strength – if it is indeed moral strength – requires.

We need a strong executive willingly to be more hawkish than any other President has ever been nowadays. This world is more than willing to get us to commit to “multilateral engagement” and other such bull while others stock up nukes and blow up buildings. Reality is that if it weren’t for people like President Bush, there wouldn’t be a dialogue to be had with the mullahs and ayatollahs – we’d be dead already.

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Powered by ScribeFire.

Filed under: Iran, liberal agenda, Presidency, War On Terror

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.