Crossposted ANewtOne
Big battle, small news
Mainstream media virtually ignore the major U.S. push in Iraq
By Jack Kelly, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
Imagine it’s June 7, 1944, the day after the D-Day invasion. You pick up your newspaper.
There’s no mention of Normandy on the front page, and only a brief reference to
it in a roundup story on an inside page.
The biggest battle since the invasion that toppled Saddam Hussein’s regime is under
way in Iraq. It’s outcome could determine whether the war is won or lost. But our
news media have paid less attention to it than to Paris Hilton’s legal troubles.
The heart of the offensive is Operation Arrowhead Ripper, in Diyala province northeast
of Baghdad, involving some 8,000 American and 2,000 Iraqi troops.
Many members of al-Qaida fled from Baghdad to Diyala, which borders on Iran,
when the U.S. troop surge began in January. There are thought to be between
1,000 and 2,000 hard-core al-Qaida fighters in Diyala, mostly in the provincial capital of Baquba.
“They are ready for us,” said former special forces soldier Michael Yon, now a
freelance journalist embedded with the U.S. troops. “Giant bombs are buried in
the roads. Snipers have chiseled holes in walls so they can shoot not from roofs or windows, but from deep inside buildings, where we cannot see the flash or hear the shots … Car bombs are already assembled. Suicide vests are prepared.”
It’s no coincidence that Arrowhead Ripper began within days of the arrival in
Baghdad of the fifth and final brigade of the troop surge.
“The U.S. ability to shift 10,000 coalition soldiers into a major operation
outside Baghdad in the midst of a major security crackdown is the mark of
significant operational flexibility,” said STRATFOR, a private intelligence
service. “This flexibility will allow the United States to keep pressure on
the jihadists and thus impede their ability to plan complex operations.”
Chiefly because of a shortage of troops, American offensives in the past have
tended just to push insurgents from one part of Iraq to another. Arrowhead Ripper is different.
“The idea this time is not to chase al-Qaida out, but to trap and kill them head on,
or in ambushes or while they sleep,” Mr. Yon said.
“The city is cordoned, neighborhoods are identified as friendly
or enemy territory, the neighborhoods are then segmented and forces
move in,” wrote Bill Roggio in his invaluable blog, Fourth Rail. “The
combat operations are then immediately followed by humanitarian and reconstruction projects.”
Simultaneous offensives are being conducted in another insurgents’ rat’s nest,
Babil province southwest of Baghdad, and in Baghdad neighborhoods where coalition
soldiers in the past have been reluctant to go.
Simultaneous offensives are the best way to gain decisive victory over a numerically
inferior force, because they prevent the enemy from shifting forces from one front
to another. The Union did not prevail in our Civil War until Grant attacked in
the East at the same time as Sherman attacked in the West.
Our soldiers are being assisted by former insurgents who have turned against
al-Qaida. Unlike the Anbar Salvation Council on which it is modeled, the Diyala
Salvation Front isn’t strong enough to take on al-Qaida by itself. But the intelligence
its members provide could prove invaluable to our troops.
You haven’t heard of the Anbar Salvation Council? Maybe that’s because our news media have tended to treat good news from Iraq as no news. When Thomas Ricks of The Washington Post reported last September that a senior Marine intelligence officer thought Anbar
province had been “lost politically,” his story attracted enormous attention from his
fellow journalists. Google lists 789,000 references to that one story.
The Anbar Salvation Council, a coalition of 41 Sunni tribes under the leadership of
Sheik Abdul Sattar al-Rishawi, has in very short order reversed that situation
(if it were ever as dire as Col. Pete Devlin imagined). Al-Qaida has been all but driven
out of Iraq’s “Wild West.” But Google lists only 114,000 mentions of the Anbar Salvation Council.
(Paris Hilton has nearly 76 million mentions.)
The Anbar Salvation Council model is spreading. The Diyala Salvation Front was formed in May. More than 10 tribes in Baghdad and its suburbs have banded together to fight al-Qaida,
USA Today reported Tuesday.
If Arrowhead Ripper succeeds, al-Qaida in Iraq will suffer a blow from which it may not recover.
“In Diyala, both the foreign jihadists and their domestic allies are beginning to feel cornered,
with few places left to hide,” STRATFOR said.
But if Arrowhead Ripper succeeds, you may not hear much about it. A U.S. victory would be too
embarrassing for those in the media who have staked their reputations on defeat.
EDITOR’S REMARKS: In a more reasonable time in our history, I would dismiss an article like this out of hand. Afterall, why wouldn’t the MSM not want us to win?
Well, it is very clear why.
The mainstream media in this country is in the iron grip of the left wing and America’s victory is their defeat. It really is that simple.
If word gets out (and it eventually has to) that we have turned the tide in Iraq and have the terrorists on the run (like the yellow dog cowards they are), the backlash against the defeatocrats will be nothing short of epic.
In 2006, the libtards took the house and senate almost exclusively on the back of unease about the Iraq war. Breaking news of a huge coalition comeback will re-fan the flames of support for the war and cause a surge in patriotic optimism that will overwhelm the Democrats in an election year Tsunami.
The beginning of the end for the Dems could very well be the General’s report in September. A small spark of hope can become a raging inferno is very short order. Pessimism about this war has acted like a big boulder around the neck of the entire country, dragging down confidence on all other issues.
A little good news for America is a whole lot of bad news for the Democratic party.
Filed under: 411, al-Qaida, Iraq, MSM, News, Support The Troops, War, War On Terror
